Occupational Heat Exposure and Heat-Related Illness in Construction Workers: Trajectories, Worker Subgroup Differences, and Workplace Intervention Effectiveness

Subject area: Medical Science DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21989965

40 Views
9 PDF downloads
— Citations (soon)

Abstract

Occupational heat exposure represents one of the most consequential climate-change-related occupational health challenges globally, with substantial burden in South Asian construction sectors where high ambient temperatures, heavy physical work, large migrant workforces, and limited regulatory enforcement intersect. We conducted a 120-day summer audit (March-July 2024) of 486 construction workers across 12 work sites with structured heat exposure monitoring (wet-bulb globe temperature, WBGT) and heat-related illness (HRI) surveillance. Worker role distribution included masons (28.4%), helpers (24.3%), roof/facade workers (14.0%), iron-binders (12.8%), and concrete workers (9.9%). Daily ambient temperature ranged 28-50 °C with estimated WBGT 24-46 °C. Daily HRI incidence rose exponentially with WBGT, with rates 30-50× higher at WBGT ≥36 °C compared with <28 °C. Heavy work intensity and migrant worker status compounded WBGT-driven risk. Strongest predictors of moderate-severe HRI included WBGT ≥34, heavy work, migrant status, limited acclimatisation, inadequate hydration, pre-existing chronic disease, and elderly age. Workplace heat-protection programmes, structured work-rest cycles with shade/water provision, and supervisor training were strongly protective. The findings support continued investment in heat action plans, workplace regulation enforcement, structured intervention, and acclimatisation programmes for migrant workers.

Keywords

occupational heat exposureconstruction workersheat-related illnessWBGTmigrant workersworkplace interventionclimate change

Cite this article

Mr. Shubham Kumar Sharma, Mrs. Komal Sharma, Dr. Nidhi Tyagi (2026). Occupational Heat Exposure and Heat-Related Illness in Construction Workers: Trajectories, Worker Subgroup Differences, and Workplace Intervention Effectiveness. International Innovations & Scholarly Trends Journal, 2(8), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21989965

Share

Copyright & License

© 2026 — Authors retain the copyright of this article. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.