IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI ON BRAND AUTHENTICITY AND CUSTOMER TRUST IN MARKETING CONTENT CREATION

Subject area: Business and Management DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21272817

73 Views
14 PDF downloads
— Citations (soon)

Abstract

Background: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming marketing content creation, but its effect on brand authenticity and customer trust remains unresolved.
Methods: This paper synthesizes peer-reviewed studies, institutional reports, and consumer surveys published between 2024 and 2026, and proposes a conceptual model in which GenAI use affects customer trust through perceived brand authenticity, moderated by disclosure strategy and human oversight.
Results: The evidence shows substantial consumer skepticism toward visible AI-generated content: half of U.S. consumers prefer brands that avoid GenAI in consumer-facing content, and only a small share report that such content increases trust. Transparent disclosure combined with visible human oversight, however, appears to reduce reputational risk and preserve brand legitimacy.
Conclusion: GenAI should be governed as a strategic issue rather than managed purely as a production tool; brands that pair algorithmic efficiency with active human stewardship are better positioned to sustain consumer trust. The framework proposed here is intended for further empirical testing.

Keywords

generative aibrand authenticitycustomer trustmarketing contentdisclosureethical marketing

Cite this article

sudhanshu shekhar ojha, vibhor kumar, Arpit verma (2026). IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI ON BRAND AUTHENTICITY AND CUSTOMER TRUST IN MARKETING CONTENT CREATION. International Innovations & Scholarly Trends Journal, 2(7), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21272817

Share

Copyright & License

© 2026 — Authors retain the copyright of this article. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.