Frailty Assessment in Older Adults: A Twenty-Four Month Cohort Across Three Frailty Strata: Phenotype Distribution, Outcomes, and Intervention Response in Three Hundred and Eighty-Two Adults Aged Sixty-Five and Older

Subject area: Medical Science DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20623979

48 Views
9 PDF downloads
— Citations (soon)

Abstract

Frailty defined by the Fried phenotype as the presence of three or more of weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow gait, and low physical activity is a clinically distinctive state of increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes in older adults. Pre-frailty (one or two criteria) represents an intermediate stage with elevated risk and substantial intervention responsiveness. We undertook a 24-month prospective cohort study of 382 community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older. Frailty distribution showed 30.9% robust, 44.0% pre-frail, and 25.1% frail. All-cause mortality differed substantially by frailty class: 24-month mortality was 5% in robust, 12% in pre-frail, and 30% in frail patients (HR for frail vs robust 5.18). Similar gradients applied for hospitalisation (4.4-fold), recurrent falls (4.8-fold), ADL functional decline (6.4-fold), and institutionalisation (4.2-fold). Multicomponent intervention including resistance exercise, protein supplementation, vitamin D, polypharmacy review, and psychosocial support produced measurable benefits with approximately 30% of pre-frail patients reverting to robust status and 22% of frail patients improving to pre-frail. The findings support routine frailty assessment in primary care and integrated multicomponent intervention for pre-frail and frail older adults.

Keywords

frailtyFried phenotypeolder adultssarcopeniacomprehensive geriatric assessmentmortalityfunctional decline

Cite this article

Dr. Faraz UL Islam, Mr. MD Salman Haider, Mr. Dipesh Kumar (2026). Frailty Assessment in Older Adults: A Twenty-Four Month Cohort Across Three Frailty Strata: Phenotype Distribution, Outcomes, and Intervention Response in Three Hundred and Eighty-Two Adults Aged Sixty-Five and Older. International Innovations & Scholarly Trends Journal, 2(6), 1695–1711. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20623979

Share

Copyright & License

© 2026 — Authors retain the copyright of this article. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.