Community Health Worker-Led Smoking Cessation in Rural Primary Care: A Pragmatic Comparative Study: Twelve-Month Abstinence and Relapse Outcomes Across Six Rural Primary Health Centres

Subject area: Medical Science DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20408241

33 Views
8 PDF downloads
— Citations (soon)

Abstract

Tobacco use remains a leading preventable cause of premature death in rural South Asian populations, yet structured cessation programmes are uncommon outside tertiary centres. We conducted a pragmatic comparative study across six rural primary health centres, comparing a structured community health worker-led (CHW-led) cessation intervention with standard physician advice. Three centres delivered the CHW-led intervention (n=180 smokers) comprising motivational interviewing, nicotine replacement therapy where appropriate, and a structured 12-week follow-up schedule with home visits. Three centres delivered standard care (n=160) consisting of brief physician advice and self-help materials. Twelve-month biochemically-verified continuous abstinence was achieved by 28.9% of CHW-arm participants compared with 11.9% of standard-care participants (adjusted OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.78-5.47). Relapse rates among early quitters were also substantially lower in the CHW arm. Strongest modifiable predictors of sustained abstinence were attendance at four or more follow-up contacts, documented family support, NRT use, and establishment of a smoke-free household. The findings support broader deployment of CHW-led structured cessation as a scalable rural intervention with substantial absolute benefit over the conventional brief-advice approach.

Keywords

smoking cessationcommunity health workerrural primary carepragmatic studynicotine replacement therapytobacco control

Cite this article

Dr. (Brig.) Vineet Rastogi, Mrs. Neha, Mr. Pradeep Kumar (2026). Community Health Worker-Led Smoking Cessation in Rural Primary Care: A Pragmatic Comparative Study: Twelve-Month Abstinence and Relapse Outcomes Across Six Rural Primary Health Centres. International Innovations & Scholarly Trends Journal, 2(6), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20408241

Share

Copyright & License

© 2026 — Authors retain the copyright of this article. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.