Abstract
The practice of restricting interactions between male and female students within educational institutions, despite their co-educational nature, presents a significant challenge to the holistic development of individuals. This paper argues that such limitations imposed by schools and colleges are deeply flawed, constituting a violation of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Beyond the curtailment of fundamental rights, these restrictions hinder students' social development, communication skills, emotional intelligence, and their preparation for future personal and professional relationships in a gender-integrated world. Through a combination of doctrinal legal research, socio-legal analysis of academic literature, and a critical evaluation of institutional justifications, this paper demonstrates the detrimental effects of limiting gender interactions. It further proposes recommendations for fostering healthy and respectful gender interactions within educational settings to ensure the comprehensive development and constitutional rights of all students are upheld.
Keywords
Freedom of Speech and ExpressionArticle 19(1)(a)Gender InteractionEducational InstitutionsFundamental RightsSocial DevelopmentEmotional IntelligenceConstitutional LawCo-education
Cite this article
Yogitha SS, Abraham.S (2026). SILENCING CONVERSATIONS: THE FLAWED LOGIC OF LIMITING GENDER INTERACTIONS IN SCHOOLS. International Innovations & Scholarly Trends Journal, 2(3), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18832257
Share
Copyright & License
© 2026 — Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This is an open access article distributed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.